Advanced undergraduateFoundationsPlanned
ZFC: axiomatic set theory
The Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms with choice as a first-order theory (extensionality, pairing, union, power set, separation, replacement, infinity, foundation, choice) and how pairs, relations, functions and numbers are encoded as sets.
math.found.zfc
The lesson for this topic has not been written yet. The outline below is part of the curriculum map and has not been reviewed.
Builds on
Required prerequisites, all the way down: 6
You will learn to
- State the ZFC axioms and explain what each one contributes.
- Encode ordered pairs, relations, functions and the natural numbers as sets, and prove the characteristic property of Kuratowski pairs.
- Explain the difference between proving a theorem in ZFC and proving that ZFC is consistent.
Definition
- ZFC is the first-order theory in the language {∈} with the axioms of extensionality, pairing, union, power set, separation (a schema), replacement (a schema), infinity, foundation and choice.
- The Kuratowski ordered pair is (a, b) = {{a}, {a, b}}.
- The von Neumann natural numbers are 0 = ∅ and n + 1 = n ∪ {n}; ω is the least set containing 0 and closed under n ↦ n + 1.
Theorem
- For Kuratowski pairs, (a, b) = (c, d) if and only if a = c and b = d.
- ZF proves that there is no set of all sets.
- If ZFC is consistent, it cannot prove its own consistency (Gödel's second incompleteness theorem).
- Most of ordinary mathematics, including analysis, algebra and topology, can be formalised in ZFC.
Common misconceptions
- Thinking ZFC says what sets 'really are'; it is a list of assumptions from which theorems are derived.
- Believing natural numbers 'are' von Neumann ordinals; that is one convenient encoding among several.
- Assuming ZFC has been proved consistent; its consistency is assumed, and cannot be proved within ZFC itself if it is consistent.
Leads to
Optional discoveries
- Elementary topos theory Lawvere's Elementary Theory of the Category of Sets (ETCS) axiomatises sets through functions instead of membership; without an added replacement axiom it is strictly weaker than ZFC.
- Axiomatic set theory: hierarchy, cardinal arithmetic and L Iterating 'sets of sets' transfinitely builds the cumulative hierarchy V_α; with the axiom of foundation, every set appears at some stage.Wonder Trail →
- Large cardinals If ZFC is consistent, it cannot prove that an inaccessible cardinal exists; at an inaccessible κ, the stage V_κ of the hierarchy is itself a model of ZFC.Wonder Trail →
- Type theory and propositions as types Lean is founded not on ZFC but on a dependent type theory. Each foundation can model the other given suitable assumptions, but they are not interchangeable.
- ← Sets
- ← Russell's paradox and why sets need axioms
Further reading
- Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory (1977)
- Kenneth Kunen, Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs (1980)