الانتقال إلى المحتوى
The Lumenary
السنة الأولى من الدراسات العلياFoundationsالدرس متاح

Forcing and independence

Relative consistency and independence: countable transitive models, posets of conditions, generic filters and the forcing relation, leading to Cohen's proof that the continuum hypothesis is independent of ZFC.

math.found.forcing

يعتمد على

عدد المتطلبات السابقة الإلزامية (حتى الأساس): 24

ستتعلّم

  • Explain what it means for a statement to be independent of ZFC and why independence proofs are relative-consistency proofs.
  • Construct a generic extension M[G] by Cohen forcing and verify that it satisfies ZFC + ¬CH, given a countable transitive model M of ZFC.
  • State Easton's theorem and give other examples of statements shown independent by forcing, such as Suslin's hypothesis.

تعريف

  • A statement φ is independent of ZFC if neither φ nor ¬φ is provable from ZFC.
  • A forcing notion is a poset (P, ≤) of conditions; a filter G ⊆ P is M-generic if it meets every dense subset of P that belongs to M.
  • The forcing relation p ⊩ φ means that φ holds in every generic extension M[G] with p ∈ G.

مبرهنة

  • Cohen (1963): if ZFC is consistent, so is ZFC + ¬CH. Together with Gödel's work on L, CH is independent of ZFC.
  • Truth lemma: φ holds in M[G] if and only if some p ∈ G forces φ.
  • Easton (1970): on regular cardinals, the function κ ↦ 2^κ can consistently be any non-decreasing function F with cf(F(κ)) > κ.

مفاهيم خاطئة شائعة

  • Thinking independence makes a question meaningless; it means ZFC does not settle it.
  • Believing forcing requires a countable transitive model of ZFC to exist; formal treatments avoid this with Boolean-valued models or by working with finite fragments of ZFC.

يقود إلى

اكتشافات اختيارية

قراءات إضافية

  • Kenneth Kunen, Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs (1980)
  • Paul J. Cohen, Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis (1966)
  • Thomas Jech, Set Theory (Third Millennium Edition) (2003)