السنة الأولى من الدراسات العلياFoundationsمُخطَّط له
Gödel's incompleteness theorems
Arithmetisation of syntax, representability of computable functions, the diagonal lemma, Gödel's first and second incompleteness theorems and Tarski's undefinability of truth.
math.found.incompleteness
لم يُكتب درس هذا الموضوع بعد. المخطط أدناه جزء من خريطة المنهج ولم تجرِ مراجعته.
يعتمد على
عدد المتطلبات السابقة الإلزامية (حتى الأساس): 24
ستتعلّم
- Explain how formulas and proofs are coded by natural numbers and why provability is expressible in arithmetic.
- Prove the diagonal lemma and derive the first incompleteness theorem, in Rosser's form, for consistent recursively axiomatised theories extending Robinson arithmetic Q.
- State the second incompleteness theorem and Tarski's theorem, and explain precisely what they do and do not say.
تعريف
- A theory is recursively axiomatised if its set of axioms is decidable.
- Robinson arithmetic Q is a weak, finitely axiomatised fragment of Peano arithmetic (PA) without the induction schema.
- Diagonal lemma: for every formula φ(x) there is a sentence G such that the theory proves G ↔ φ(⌜G⌝), where ⌜G⌝ is the numeral of G's code.
مبرهنة
- First incompleteness theorem (Gödel 1931; Rosser 1936): every consistent, recursively axiomatised theory extending Q is incomplete.
- Second incompleteness theorem: a consistent, recursively axiomatised theory extending PA does not prove its own (standard) consistency statement.
- Tarski: the set of true sentences of arithmetic is not definable in arithmetic.
- Presburger arithmetic (addition only) and the theory of real closed fields are complete and decidable, so incompleteness needs enough arithmetic.
مفاهيم خاطئة شائعة
- Claiming Gödel showed that 'some truths can never be known'; the theorems concern provability in a fixed formal theory.
- Applying the theorems to theories that are not recursively axiomatised or cannot interpret enough arithmetic.
- Thinking the second theorem leaves PA's consistency wholly unsupported; it can be proved in stronger systems, for example by Gentzen's method using induction up to ε₀.
يقود إلى
اكتشافات اختيارية
- Large cardinals If ZFC is consistent it cannot prove that an inaccessible cardinal exists, because such a cardinal κ would give a model V_κ of ZFC and hence prove Con(ZFC).
- ← True, false, and, or, not
- ← Countability and Cantor's diagonal argument
قراءات إضافية
- Peter Smith, An Introduction to Gödel's Theorems (2007)
- George S. Boolos, John P. Burgess and Richard C. Jeffrey, Computability and Logic
- Herbert B. Enderton, A Mathematical Introduction to Logic (1972)