九至十二年级Foundations课程已上线
Countability and Cantor's diagonal argument
Comparing infinite sets by bijections: ℕ, ℤ and ℚ are countable, every set is strictly smaller than its power set, and Cantor's diagonal argument shows that the real numbers are uncountable.
math.found.countability
前置知识
14 项必需的前置知识(一直追溯到底)
你将学会
- Show that ℤ and ℚ are countable by constructing explicit enumerations or bijections.
- Define the power set P(A) and prove Cantor's theorem that no function A → P(A) is surjective.
- Reproduce Cantor's diagonal argument that [0, 1) is uncountable, handling numbers with two decimal expansions.
定义
- Sets A and B have the same cardinality if there is a bijection A → B.
- A set is countable if it is finite or has the same cardinality as ℕ; otherwise it is uncountable.
- The power set P(A) is the set of all subsets of A.
定理
- ℤ, ℚ and ℕ × ℕ are countable.
- A countable union of countable sets is countable (the general statement uses the axiom of countable choice).
- Cantor's theorem: for every set A there is no surjection from A onto P(A).
- ℝ is uncountable; in fact ℝ and P(ℕ) have the same cardinality.
常见误解
- Thinking a proper subset of an infinite set must be smaller: ℕ and the even numbers have the same cardinality.
- Objecting that the diagonal number 'can just be added to the list'; the argument shows that every list misses some number.
- Forgetting that 0.4999… = 0.5, which a careful diagonal argument must avoid (for example by never changing a digit to 0 or 9).
通向
可选发现
- Forcing and independence Is there a set strictly larger than ℕ but smaller than ℝ? This is the continuum hypothesis; Gödel (1940) and Cohen (1963) showed that, if ZFC is consistent, it can be neither proved nor refuted in ZFC.探奇小径 →
- Gödel's incompleteness theorems A diagonal idea reappears in Gödel's proof through a self-referential sentence; the resemblance is genuine in spirit, but Gödel's diagonal lemma is a different construction.
- ← Counting
- ← Sets
- ← Set-builder notation, quantifiers and infinite sets
- ← Rational numbers
学习路径
延伸阅读
- Paul R. Halmos, Naive Set Theory (1960)
- Martin Aigner and Günter M. Ziegler, Proofs from THE BOOK (1998)